Justiciable

Clear Law. Real Cases

Menu
  • Home
  • Portfolio
  • Our Story
  • Services
    • What We Do
    • Resources
  • Contact Us
Menu

Constitutional & Administrative Law

  • The Pardon and the ProcessSeptember 19, 2026
    Najib Razak has been granted a conditional pardon and will serve the remainder of his SRC sentence under house arrest until August 2028. The Pardons Board met and advised first — the process the High Court said was required when it dismissed his earlier bid.
  • Kedah, the Pool Betting Licences, and the Constitutional Boundary It Could Not CrossAugust 19, 2026
    Kedah’s decision to stop renewing premises licences for lottery and pool betting outlets triggered a constitutional contest over the limits of state power. The Federal Court’s refusal of leave leaves intact the Court of Appeal’s 2–1 ruling that a state cannot use local licensing authority to prohibit an activity Parliament has placed under federal control.
  • Petronas, Sarawak, and the Petroleum Rights the Law Has Yet to SettleAugust 2, 2026
    Petronas has been granted leave to challenge several Sarawak petroleum laws, with a full hearing tentatively set for January 2027. The case will test the division of regulatory authority between the Federation and the Borneo states — and the legal effect of Malaysia’s founding bargains.
  • The Orang Asli Villagers and Their Ancestral RightJune 21, 2026
    When seven Orang Asli villagers sued a company for destroying their ancestral graves, the Federal Court ruled that customary land rights survive relocation and cannot be extinguished by a commercial lease. The decision is a landmark affirmation that indigenous dignity and constitutional protections extend to burial grounds, even when titles change hands.
  • Simon Momoh and the Unlawful DetentionMay 28, 2026
    A Nigerian man served his one‑day sentence for drink driving but was detained for 40 days. The High Court awarded RM675,000 in damages for unlawful confinement.
  • The Constitution’s Rules and the House Arrest BidApril 14, 2026
    A judicial review tested whether a royal addendum could bypass the Pardons Board. The High Court said no.
© 2026 justiciable.media. All rights reserved.
A Publication of ILS Smart Solutions (M) Sdn Bhd (Reg. No. 202401014953)
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}